We’ve been talking a lot about the science
of how things move — you throw a ball in the air, and there are ways to predict exactly how it will fall. But there’s something we’ve been leaving
out: forces, and why they make things accelerate. And for that, we’re going to turn to a physicist
you’ve probably heard of: Isaac Newton. With his three laws, published in 1687 in his book
Principia, Newton outlined his understanding of motion — and a lot of his ideas were
totally new. Today, more than 300 years later, if you’re
trying to describe the effects of forces on just about any everyday object — a box on
the ground, a reindeer pulling a sleigh, or an elevator taking you up to your apartment
— then you’re going to want to use Newton’s Laws. And yes. I’ll explain the reindeer thing
in a minute. [Theme Music] Newton’s first law is all about inertia,
which is basically an object’s tendency to keep doing what it’s doing. It’s often stated as: “An object in motion
will remain in motion, and an object at rest will remain at rest, unless acted upon by
a force.” Which is just another way of saying that,
to change the way something moves — to give it ACCELERATION — you need a net force. So, how do we measure inertia? Well, the most important thing to know is
mass. Say you have two balls that are the same size, but one is an inflatable beach
ball and the other is a bowling ball. The bowling ball is going to be harder to
move, and harder to stop once it’s moving. It has more inertia because it has more mass. Makes sense, right? More mass means more STUFF,
with a tendency to keep doing what it was doing before your force came along, and interrupted
it. And this idea connects nicely to Newton’s
second law: net force is equal to mass x acceleration. Or, as an equation, F(net)=ma. It’s important to remember that we’re
talking about NET force here — the amount of force left over, once you’ve added together
all the forces that might cancel each other out. Let’s say you have a hockey puck sitting on a perfectly
frictionless ice rink. And I know ice isn’t perfectly frictionless but stick with it.
If you’re pushing the puck along with a stick, that’s a force on it – that
isn’t being canceled out by anything else. So the puck is experiencing acceleration. But when the puck is just sitting still, or
even when it’s sliding across the ice after you’ve pushed it, then all the forces are
balanced out. That’s what’s known as equilibrium. An object that’s in equilibrium can still be MOVING, like the sliding puck, but its VELOCITY won’t be changing. It’s when the forces get UNbalanced, that
you start to see the exciting stuff happen. And probably the most common case of a net
force making something move is the gravitational force. Say you throw a 5 kg ball straight up in the
air — and then, yknow, get out of the way, because that could really hurt if it hits
you… But the force of gravity is pulling down on the ball, which is accelerating downward at a rate of 9.81 m/s^2. So the net force is equal to m a, but the
only force acting here is gravity. This means that, if we could measure the acceleration of the ball, we’d be able to calculate the force of gravity. And we CAN measure the acceleration — it’s
9.81 m/s^2, the value we’ve been calling small g. So the force of gravity on the ball must be 5 kg,
which is the mass of the ball… times small g which comes to 49.05 kilograms
times meters per second squared! We use this equation for gravity so much
that it’s often just written as F(g)=mg. That’s how you determine the force of
gravity, otherwise known as weight. Now, those units can be a bit of a mouthful,
so we just call them Newtons. That’s right! We measure weight in Newtons,
in honor of Sir Isaac, and NOT kilograms! Kilograms are a measure of mass! But gravity often isn’t the only force
acting on the object. So when we’re trying to calculate a NET force, we usually have to take into account more than just gravity. This is where we get into one of the forces that tends to show up a lot, which is explained by Newton’s third law. You probably know this law as “for every
action, there’s an equal but opposite reaction.” Which just means that if you exert a force
on an object, it exerts an equal force back on you. And that’s what we call the normal force. “Normal” in this instance means “perpendicular”,
and the normal force is always perpendicular to whatever surface your object is resting
on. At least, it is when you’re pushing on something
big, and macroscopic, like a table. If you put a book down on a table, the normal
force is pushing — and therefore pointing — up. But if you put it on a ramp, then the normal
force is pointing perpendicular to the ramp. Now, the normal force isn’t like most other forces.
It’s special, because it changes its magnitude. Say you have a piece of aluminum foil stretched
tightly across the top of a bowl, and then you put one lonely grape on top of it. Because of gravity, that grape is exerting
a little bit of force on the foil, and the normal force pushes right back, with the same
amount. But then you add another grape, which doubles the force on the foil — in that case, the normal force doubles too. That’ll keep happening until eventually
you add enough grapes that they break through the foil. That’s what happens when the normal force
can’t match the force pushing against it. But, what does Newton’s famous third law
really mean, though? When I push on this desk with my finger
right now, I’m applying a force to it. And it’s applying an equal force right back on my finger
— one that I can actually feel. But if that’s true — and it is — then
why are we able to move things? How can I pick up this mug?
Or how can a reindeer pull a sleigh? Basically, things can move because there’s
more going on, than just the action and reaction forces. For example, when a reindeer pulls on a sleigh,
Newton’s third law tells us that the sleigh is pulling back on it with equal force. But the reindeer can still move the sleigh
forward, because it’s standing on the ground. When it takes a step, it’s pushing backward on the ground with its foot — & the ground is pushing it forward. Meanwhile, the reindeer is also pulling on
the sleigh, while the sleigh is pulling right back. But the force from the GROUND PUSHING
the reindeer forward is STRONGER than the force from the sleigh pulling it back. So
the animal accelerates forward, and so does the sleigh. So, one takeaway here is that: there would
be no Christmas without physics! But, now that we have an idea of some of the
forces we might encounter, let’s describe what’s happening when a box is sitting on
the ground. The first thing to do — which is the first
thing you should ALWAYS do when you’re solving a problem like this — is draw what’s known
as a free body diagram. Basically, you draw a rough outline of the
object, put a dot in the middle, and then draw and label arrows, to represent all the
forces. We also have to decide which direction is
positive — in this case, we’ll choose up to be positive. For our box, the free body diagram is pretty
simple. There’s an arrow pointing down, representing the force of gravity, and an
arrow pointing up, representing the force of the ground pushing back on the box. Since the box is staying still, we know that
it’s not accelerating, which tells us that those forces are equal, so the net force is
equal to 0. But what if you attach a rope to the top of
the box, then connect it to the ceiling so the box is suspended in the air? Your net force is still 0, because there’s
no acceleration on the box. And gravity is still pulling down in the same way it was
before. But now, the counteracting upward force comes from the rope acting on the box, in what we call the tension force. To make our examples simpler, we almost always
assume that ropes have no mass and are completely unbreakable — no matter how much you pull
on them, they’ll pull right back. Which means that the tension force isn’t
fixed. If the box weighs 5 Newtons, then the tension in the rope is also 5 Newtons. But
if we add another 5 Newtons of weight, the tension in the rope will become 10 Newtons. Kind of like how the normal force changes,
with the grapes on the foil. But in this case, it’s in response to a pulling force instead
of a push. The key is that no matter what, you can add
the forces together to give you a particular net force — even though that net force might
NOT always be 0. Like, in an elevator. So let’s say you’re in an elevator — or
as I call them, a lift. The total mass of the lift, including you,
is 1000 kg. And its movement is controlled by a counterweight, attached to a pulley. The plan is to set up a counterweight of 850kg,
and then let the lift go. Once you let go, the lift is going to start accelerating downward
– because it’s HEAVIER than the counterweight. And the hope is that the counterweight will
keep it from accelerating TOO much. But how will we know if it’s safe? How quickly
is the lift going to accelerate downward? To find out, first let’s draw a free body
diagram for the lift, making UP the positive direction. The force of gravity on the lift is pulling it down, and it’s equal to the mass of the lift x small g — 9810 Newtons of force, in
the negative direction. And the force of tension is pulling the lift UP, in the positive direction. Which means that for the lift, the net force is equal to the tension force, minus the mass of the lift x small g. Now! Since Newton’s first law tells us that
F(net)=ma, we can set all of that to be equal to the lift’s mass, times some downward
acceleration, a. That’s what we’re trying to solve for. So, let’s do the same thing for the counterweight. Gravity is pulling it down with 8338.5 N
of force in the negative direction. And again, the force of tension is pulling
it up, so that the net force is equal to the tension force, minus the mass of the counterweight
times small g. And again, because of Newton’s second law,
we know that all of that is equal to the mass of the counterweight, times that same acceleration,
“a” — which is positive this time since the counterweight is moving upward. So! Putting that all together, we end up with
two equations — and two unknowns. We don’t have a value for the tension force,
and we don’t have a value for acceleration. But what we’re trying to solve for is the
acceleration. So we use algebra to do that. When you have a system of equations like this,
you can add or subtract all the terms on each side of the equals sign, to turn them into
one equation. For example, if you know that 1 + 2=3 and
that 4 + 2=6, you can subtract the first equation from the second to get 3=3. And in our case, with the lift, subtracting
the first equation from the second gets rid of the term that represents the tension force. We now just have to solve for acceleration — meaning, we need to rearrange the equation to set everything equal to “a.” We end up with an equation that really just
says that “a” is equal to the difference between the weights — or the net force on
the system — divided by the total mass. Essentially, this is just a fancier version of F(net)=ma. And we can solve that for “a”,
which turns out to be 0.795 m/s^2. Which is not that much acceleration at all! So, as long as you aren’t dropping too far
down, you should be fine. Even if the landing is a little bumpy. In this episode, you learned about Newton’s
three laws of motion: how inertia works, that net force is equal to mass x acceleration,
how physicists define equilibrium, and all about the “normal” force and the “tension”
force. Crash Course Physics is produced in association
with PBS Digital Studios. You can head over to their channel to check out amazing shows like: BrainCraft, It’s OK To Be Smart, and PBS Idea Channel. This episode of Crash Course was filmed in
the Doctor Cheryl C. Kinney Crash Course Studio with the help of these amazing people and
our Graphics Team is Thought Cafe.
lol yes
2:35…. oh nah stand in front of it. yeh sick
Error at 8:33. Newton’s first law is inertia. She meant to say Newton’s second law
8:34 – Newtons first law isn't F=ma, it's the second
she is genius ,but she talks fast
This was super useful
thanks😁
Hey, it's Gordon Bombay
Oof..
Since it's acceleration, shouldn't it be speeding up?
is that a 5×5?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?
when you have a science test tomorrow and forgot to study
I got lost at around 7 minutes
Great video tho😀
Lost me at the equation rearrangement LOL
P.V Sindhu😂
This is even easier to understand than my physics class
helloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
still makes no sense here comes a C on my report card☺️☺️
Thank you for this video! It helped sooo much, I'm a fifth grader trying to learn the order.
thank you so much for making this wonderful video free!!
Dang!!!!! She is beautiful!!!! I'm not worthy.
Great Video! Helped alot!
Nice
Can anyone please explain, Why in the elevator problem in both cases the tension forces is same ?
It’s very helpful
I lost it at his 3rd law rip
the pull of gravity is (9.8)
Gosh i think I learn more in YouTube than my teacher's stuffs thinks that she knows too much while she was fooling us around"LOVE U YOU TUBE TEACHERS"got to understand alot
Most sexiest teacher
Thanks a lot
I didnt understand it that well 🙁
thanks for making it much more difficult
like
The animations are hella funny
it is too fast and i can't understand and even when i put it on slowmo it didn't make any sense
santa is fake
Love how she pops Newton's head
I feel nerdy watching this
I’m confused at 9:00. Why does she say we don’t know Ft? If we know the weight of the lift and the counter weight, why don’t we know the tension force? Isn’t Ft = mg????
May the Force be with you!
8ball?
Your voice is so elegant!
Hola
You can pick up the mug with your hands
I like your accent 👌👌👌👌👌
Who else is watching this before their AP Physics exam
Watching this before my midterm
newtons 5th law is food won't lift its self to your mouth.
Nice Isaac Newton's 3 Laws
I didnt know I was actually subscribed already, I thought this was a new channel
I see equal and opposite reaction when I kick (even punch!?) a football, very hard. Before it would fly away it returned the force back to my foot, usually causing pain, However I can relativly painlessly throw a football really hard , I can visualize myself as a Heman throwing something roughly my body's mass forward while standing on ice and that then I would slide back a little, When do I slide? Contionously as I apply force, (my personal guess) and/or.when it leaves my hands (where I have to stop applying force anyways)? Outside of evoking Newton;s Third Law I have confusion as to things like why showerheads fly back when given enough water pressure, firearms recoil, and how rockets move. If possible please do an example of how Newton's Third Law acts on objects that are shot or thrown and the other objects that launch them.
ice rink, no forces?
HOW BOUT GRAVITY
AND AIR RESISTANCE AND NORMAL FORCE
So we have been living our lives on what people said hundreds of years ago.. how about we send up a balloon with stability controlling propellers and see if newtons 3rd law really exists
Nice Physics science
This course seems to gloss over a lot of things I think a lot more than others on crash course.
Danaerys died. Spoiler
anyone here doing their GCSE's
E
thank u
How in 0:23 Newton turned into blue
bruh momentum
She never stops to speak right?
5:53 very funny
But reindeer fly they do not need to pull a slay on the ground.
0:39 lmao it's solid snake
more "stuff"
lol
I dont understand anything
I cant focus on the video because of my habit reading the comments while watching😂
How can a reindeer pull a sleigh? Elf magic of course.
damn…i thought hank would crash in with his trebuchet
So which one of newtons laws would describe when a car is moving and then comes to an abrupt stop, the passenger is then thrown forward, which law is being demonstrated here?
Gallileo, Gallileo, Gallileo, Gallileo, Gallileo, figaro, magnifico…
8:35 newtons first law?
A building collapsed about 20 years ago called building 7. NIST had the task of telling the world how and why it collapsed. They insist that it is perfectly normal for a modern steel framed building to collapse into its own footprint at free fall acceleration. Many people have measured this collapse and have determined that it did indeed reach free fall for about 100 ft. How can it reach free fall from a fire induced collapse? Buildings have much more than zero resistance even when they are on fire. At the risk of sounding like a crazy conspiracy theorist I would like to invite everyone to look into the anomalies around 9ll and building 7. Everyone should familiarize themselves with NISTs conclusions about what happened. Also look up the nist whistle blower.
how old are you when you learn these laws ?
Thanks a lot.. Executive!!!!!!
how old are u mam
She ignored probably the most important principle of resistance 🤫😓
Who's A Class9 Student Here 'Cause Can't Understand Ncert Or Is Lazy To Open The Dang Textbook
The quality of your videos are amazing, and also interesting! Thank you.
.
There is no third Newton's law when WTC 911 collapses
That rubik's cube is making me frustratingly happy
I seriously didnt understand a thing
I AM FROM THE FUUTURRRRRE
Hi, Nice to watch your video. But there is something I can't get my head round
in relation to the laws of physics with a round disk full of information.
I will try to explain what I mean. A record will turn at a set speed say 45 RPM.
how can the center or near center turn at the same speed as the outer perimeter and arrive back to the start at the same time as the outer?
Or let say if you walked around the inner circle of your town at 12 miles per hour
from a starting point and at the same time someone else walked around the outer circle of your town
at the exact speed 12 miles per hour who would have completed the walk first.
I think logic would say, well you would because you had less distance to walk as you were on
the inner circle. I hope you're still with me? So now if you place a record on a turntable
and drew a white line from the center to the outer edge then switch on the rotation at 45 RPM the inner circle will arrive back at the starting point the exact same time as the outer circle.? how can this be possible.
Malc UK.
Nice
Why the British accent?
After a long time, I finally understand on how to solve the problem
A genius dies another is born
Laws of motion do not work, My crush atracts me but I do not atract her. 🙂
what is the law exerted in cable cars?
I forget the whole thing. My rise was approximately at the beginning. What a remarkable creature. So well spoken.
Solution:
Given: u= 20 m/s; F= 500 m/s; m = 100 kg
By newton's 2nd law of motion,
F=ma;
or, 500= 100 a
or, a = 500/100
therefore, a= 5 m/s*s
By equation of motion,
v= u+at
or, 0=205t
or, 20=5t
therefore, t= 4 s
By equation of motion,
S=ut+1/2*at*t
or,S=20*4+1/2*5*4*4
or S= 80+40
therefore, S= 120m
Ans : The car would stop after covering a distance of 120 m.
OMG THE MIGHTY DUCKS
No Xmass without Newton, a crash course in spirituality as well !
newtons 3rd law example: a gun fires, there is a recoil
Hate physics
a kid at rest will remain at rest until yelled at by their mom
This is the amount of laws that Newton made

V